|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
66
   |
Posted - 2012.05.24 18:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
no defending champion to beat is p. lame :O |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 19:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
I found your mistake Garmon!
"Of course we will get everyone in one corp for the training in Sisi because of the logistical nightmare it is."
that's not a very "seperate teams" kinda thing to do
nobody to blame but yourself really |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 19:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:I found your mistake Garmon!
"Of course we will get everyone in one corp for the training in Sisi because of the logistical nightmare it is."
that's not a very "seperate teams" kinda thing to do
nobody to blame but yourself really Good job quoting out of context. Still mad about getting outplayed for your Adrestia I see. Any training done in a wormhole requires everyone to be in the same corporation for using the hangers. All of PL is in one corp on SiSi all of Darkside is in one corp on SiSi. However you miss the point entirely where we ASKED if we could do this BEFORE we did it and they said NOTHING apart from the GM who said that we could do it.
I don't agree that it's out of context but OK
I read all your correspondence and nowhere did he say you could use the same corp for both teams on SiSi
you do realize PL is one alliance right ? it's not two alliances testing against each other and sharing logistics / theorycraft / planning
same with Darkside.
are goons and test alliance using the same corp on sisi ? or are they you know actually seperate teams doing their own logistics, theorycraft and preparation in general
but yeah obviously I'm just buttmad about an adrestia (lol) |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:Understand that testing in regular space is different than testing in a wormhole. Explain to me how you can test with two teams in a wormhole?
Are you seriously arguing that we should've had two corps in the wormhole with two pos and two sets of everything as proof of being separate?
That we tested together isn't even the issue. The issue is that we asked for clarification and outlined our full intentions before we did ANYTHING and received no response until now.
Yeah you should've kept your teams more seperate is exactly what I was arguing. (Not sure how you can disagree when you already know what happens when you don't)
Setting up two POS isn't exactly super difficult, and I know exactly what wormholes and logistics to them is like, it's a pain in the ass, but you wouldn't have had to split up the hauling, could just deposit half at one POS, eject and have someone in other alliance take the rest.
That's assuming you weren't sharing all theorycraft and using the exact same setups of course (which is probably an incorrect assumption)
Was the GM response misleading ? Yes, do CCP in general suck at communicating ? Of course. Did you behave and look as if you were the same team (again) ? Absolutely. |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
No believe it or not I prefer a better tournament, which it obviously would be with you in it. (assuming we didn't have a repeat of last year's finals anyway)
However you're wrong about them saying you could test "like this", a senior GM said you could test against each other, nobody said that you could in effect be the same team right up until tourney starts. |
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
Dystopia Alliance
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:Please address this point then:
[quote=Duncan Tanner]Any two teams that test against each other regularly will know the exact setups of the other team anyway. Setting up two POS in the same wormhole is going to prevent this somehow?
I think it's irrelevant, only thing that matters here is what it looks like to whoever's enforcing/interpreting the rules. |
|
|
| |
|